Du Val v. Miller’s Empirical Analysis
1948
Citation profile
3
cited by 3 later decisions
1
states following
April 1984
most recently cited
3 state decisions
Relationships
Relies on Anderson v. Richards · Vance v. Wood · Kalyton v. Kalyton · Laurance v. Tucker · Mascall v. Murray
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 3 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“[I]f the possession of the Duncans was of the character required by the rules which give effect to adverse possession, the [plaintiffs'] possession did not come up to that standard. It was not exclusive.”
1 later decision quote this exact passagee.g. Evans v. Hogue“we are satisfied that shortly after [plaintiffs] received their deed, [defendant] asserted title to the disputed strip and the right to its possession,”
1 later decision quote this exact passagee.g. Evans v. Hogue“an adverse possessor to tack his possession on to that of a previous adverse possessor, if privity existed between the two,”
1 later decision quote this exact passagee.g. Evans v. Hogue
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.