Rauton v. the Pullman Co.’s Empirical Analysis
1937
Citation profile
2 federal appellate · 1 district · 7 state decisions
How this case has been cited
Cited by 15 later decisions — most recently September 2015
2 federal appellate · 1 district · 7 state decisions
Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 15 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“the fact that the law of two states may differ does not necessarily imply that the law of one state violates the public policy of the other.”
1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority“against good morals or natural justice, or that for some other reason the enforcement of it would be prejudicial to the general interests”
1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority“[P]rohibited marriages, wagers, lotteries, racing, contracts for gaming or the sale of liquor....”
1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.