Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist

183 So. 2d 235

Otis v. Wieder

District Court of Appeal of Florida

Decided February 1, 1966

District Court of Appeal of Florida · decided 1966-02-01

Cited by 1 later decisions — most recently July 1966

Relies on Campbell v. Magana · Weekley, Et Vir. v. Knight · 155 So. 2d 831 - Suritz v. Kelner

Good law ✅— No negative treatment on recordhow we know

Decided 1966-02-01

View the full empirical analysis of this case →

PER CURIAM.

¶1The order of the trial judge dismissing appellant’s counterclaim, for failure to state a cause of action, is affirmed upon authority of Raphael v. Koretzky, Fla.App.1958, 102 So.2d 746. See also Weekley v. Knight, 116 Fla. 721, 156 So. 625 (1934); Suritz v. Kelner, Fla.App.1963, 155 So.2d 831; Campbell v. Magana, 184 Cal.App.2d 751, 8 Cal.Rptr. 32 (1960); and anno., 45 A.L.R.2d 5.

¶2Appellant’s contention that she was deprived of an opportunity to amend her counterclaim is conclusively refuted by the record.

¶3Affirmed.

/183/so2d/235 · .json · Public domain