183 So. 2d 27 - Busbee v. State’s Empirical Analysis
1966
Citation profile
9 state decisions
How this case has been cited
Cited by 10 later decisions — most recently May 2017
9 state decisions
Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.
Relationships
Relies on Harris v. State · State v. Bacom · Harris v. State · 39 So. 2d 794 - Bacom v. State
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 10 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
““ * * * However, where the transactions giving rise to the two crimes are the same as a matter of fact, even though the offenses are not identical as a matter of law, a defendant may under the principle of res judicata, which is included in a plea under the broader doctrine of former jeopardy, show that the acquittal on the first charge was necessarily controlled by the determination of a particular issue or issues of fact which would preclude his conviction of the second charge.””
2 later decisions quote this exact passage“Accordingly, matters directly determined by a criminal court of competent jurisdiction cannot subsequently be disputed by the same parties.”
1 later decision quote this exact passage“[T]he doctrine of res judicata is just as applicable to judgments in criminal prosecutions as to those in civil cases... .”
1 later decision quote this exact passage
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.