Branch v. Hinson’s Empirical Analysis
1966
Citation profile
3 state decisions
How this case has been cited
Cited by 3 later decisions — most recently January 2011
3 state decisions
Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.
Relationships
Relies on Opdenwyer v. Brown · Sessum v. Hemperley · Williams v. Bernstein · Foscue v. Mitchell · 12 La. App. 503 - Blanchard v. Monrose
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 3 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“offers to purchase did not constitute recognition of [the record owner's] title * * *, but were merely attempts to compromise a disagreement without acknowledging or recognizing [the record owner's] title to the land in dispute.”
1 later decision quote this exact passagee.g. Cahill v. Morrow“on several occasions [the claimant] attempted to purchase the strip in controversy as a means of settling all doubt as to where the correct dividing line lay[,]”
1 later decision quote this exact passagee.g. Cahill v. Morrow“a dispute arose between the adjoining owners as to precisely where the [property] line lay.”
1 later decision quote this exact passagee.g. Cahill v. Morrow
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.