Bennett v. Sears’s Empirical Analysis
1966
Citation profile
3 state decisions
Relationships
Relies on 138 So. 2d 433 - Steagall v. Houston Fire & Casualty Insurance Co. · Bell v. Feibleman & Co. · Regenbogen v. Southern Shipwrecking Corporation · 100 So. 2d 311 - Gosey v. Kansas City Southern Railway Co. · Gibson v. J. C. Penney Co.
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 3 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“[p]resent day merchandising demands an attractiveness to a large patronage,”
1 later decision quote this exact passage
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.