Burrell v. State’s Empirical Analysis
2015
Citation profile
3
cited by 3 later decisions
1
states following
November 2018
most recently cited
3 state decisions
Relationships
Relies on 584 So. 2d 786 - Grubb v. State · Nelson v. State · McBeath v. State
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 3 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“[A]nd the said Rosa Wallace having been previously convicted of possession of cocaine greater than .1 grams in Case No. CR-02-169(PF)L in the First Judicial District Court of Lee County, Mississippi, and sentenced on August 22, 2002, to serve a term of eight (8) years in the [c]ustody of the [MDOC]; and the said Rosa Wallace having been previously convicted of possession of cocaine less than .1 grams in Case No. CR-02-605-(PF)L in the First Judicial District Court of Lee County, Mississip pi, and sentenced on August 22, 2002, to serve a term of four (4). years in the [cjustody of the [MDOC]; and the said Rosa Wallace having been previously convicted of possession of cocaine greater than ,1 grams in Case No, CR-02-169(PF)L in the First Judicial District Court of Lee County, Mississippi, and sentenced on August 22, 2002, to serve a term of eight (8) years in the [c]ustody of the [MDOC] and the said Rosa Wallace thereby coming under Séction 41-29-147, Mississippi Code 1972 Annotated, as amended, a MISSISSIPPI SECOND OFFENDER STATUTES and the said Rosa Wallace thus having been convicted twice previously of felonies upon charges separately brought and arising out of separate incidents at different times and having been sentenced to separate terms of one (1) years or more in a state and/or federal penal institution, and the said Rosa Wallace thereby coming under Section 99-19-81, Mississippi Code 1972 Annotated, as amended, a MISSISSIPPI HABITUAL OFFENDER STATUTE!,] contrary to the”
1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the concurrence
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.