Fulco v. Fulco’s Empirical Analysis
2015
Citation profile
5 state decisions
Relationships
Relies on 358 So. 2d 919 - Sims v. Sims · Karen Leclerc · Doerr v. Mobil Oil Corp. · 403 So. 2d 56 - Curtis v. Curtis · 665 So. 2d 523 - Heritage Worldwide, Inc. v. Jimmy Swaggart Ministries
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 5 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“lanThe court is authorized, on motion for new trial in a nonjury case, to use the testimony and documents already in evidence and reconsider the previous judgment. Heritage Worldwide Inc. v. Jimmy Swaggart Ministries, 95-0484 (La. App. 1 Cir. 11/16/95), 665 So.2d 523 , writ denied, 96-0415 (La. 3/29/96), 670 So.2d 1233 ; Russell v. McDonald’s Corp., 576 So.2d 1213 (La. App. 1[5] Cir.1991). The court has great discretion to admit new evidence or merely to reconsider the existing evidence in light of the arguments. LeBlanc v. City of Donaldsonville, 2003-2533 (La. 10/29/04), 897 So.2d 104 .”
1 later decision quote this exact passage
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.