Daniel v. Henderson’s Empirical Analysis
1944
Citation profile
2
cited by 2 later decisions
1
states following
February 1984
most recently cited
1 state decisions
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 2 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“[T]he note in question had been declared due and placed in the hands of an attorney for collection prior to the institution of the suit. The attorney’s fees provided in the note are therefore part of the indebtedness due .”
1 later decision quote this exact passage
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.