Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 183 SW2D 577 - Maxwell v. Harrell

Maxwell v. Harrell’s Empirical Analysis

1944

Citation profile

10
cited by 10 later decisions
1
states following
May 2018
most recently cited

10 state decisions

How this case has been cited

Cited by 10 later decisions — most recently May 2018

10 state decisions

3019441950196019701980199020002010decided

Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.

Relationships

Relies on McMurry v. Stanley · Cain v. Bonner · Wagnon v. Wagnon · Duren v. Houston & Texas Central Railway Co. · Hill v. Conrad

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 10 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. ““The right to present cross-points or assignments is subject to some qualifications. When an appellant appeals from a part, only of a severable judgment, the appellee will not be heard to complain of any matters falling wholly within the portion of the judgment not brought up for review by the appellant. In such case it is incumbent upon the appellee to prosecute his own appeal from the portion of the judgment adverse to him. So also, where one did not apply for a writ of error and complaint of a separable part of the judgment of the Court of Civil Appeals against him, that part is not before the Supreme Court for review.””
    1 later decision quote this exact passage

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.