State v. MacLin’s Empirical Analysis
2006
Citation profile
12
cited by 12 later decisions
3
states following
July 2012
most recently cited
12 state decisions
Relationships
Relies on Crawford v. Washington · Ohio v. Roberts · Pointer v. Texas · California v. Green · Pennsylvania v. Ritchie
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 12 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“(1) whether the declarant was a victim or an observer; (2) whether contact was initiated by the declarant or by law-enforcement officials; (3) the degree of formality attending the circumstances in which the statement was made; (4) whether the statement was given in response to questioning, whether the questioning was structured, and the scope of such questioning; (5) whether the statement was recorded (either in writing or by electronic means); (6) the declarant’s purpose in making the statements; (7) the officer’s purpose in speaking with the declarant; and (8) whether an objective declarant under the circumstances would believe that the statements would be used at a trial.”
3 later decisions quote this exact passage · from the majoritye.g. State v. Lewis · State v. Parker“presumably to clarify what was meant by the term ‘testimonial.’ ” Id. at 345 n. 9. 4 . Typically, the term”
1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majoritye.g. State v. Lewis
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.