Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 183 U.S. 365 - Carter v. McClaughry

Carter v. McClaughry’s Empirical Analysis

183 U.S. 365 · 1902

Citation profile

587
cited by 587 later decisions
77
cited 77 times by the Supreme Court
13
states following
August 2022
most recently cited

281 federal appellate · 46 district · 39 state decisions

How this case has been cited

Cited by 587 later decisions (77 by the Supreme Court) — most recently August 2022 · most notably Pinkerton v. United States (1946), Parker v. Levy (1974)

281 federal appellate · 46 district · 39 state decisions — followed in 13 states

10801902191019201930194019501960197019801990200020102020decided

Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.

Relationships

Relies on Claassen v. United States · Morey v. Commonwealth · Smith v. Whitney · Dynes v. Hoover

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 587 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. ““ ‘A conviction or acquittal upon one indictment is no bar to a subsequent conviction and sentence upon another, unless the evidence required to support a conviction upon one of them would have been sufficient to warrant a conviction upon the other. The test is not whether the defendant has already been tried for the same act, but whether he has been put in jeopardy for the same offense. A single act may be an offense against two statutes; and if each statute requires proof of an additional fact which the other does not, an acquittal or- conviction under either statute does not exempt the defendant from prosecution and punishment under the other.’ ””
    7 later decisions quote this exact passage · from the majority
  2. “He was a military prisoner though he had ceased to be a soldier; and for offenses committed during his confinement he was liable to trial and punishment by court-martial under the rules and articles of war.”
    5 later decisions quote this exact passage · from the majority
  3. ““The fact that both charges related to and grew out of one transaction made no difference.” 183 U. S. 394 , 395, 22 Sup. Ct. 193 , 46 L. Ed. 236 .”
    4 later decisions quote this exact passage · from the majority

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.