Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 183 VA 42 - Griscom v. Childress

Griscom v. Childress’s Empirical Analysis

1944

Citation profile

36
cited by 36 later decisions
1
states following
August 2016
most recently cited

3 federal appellate · 29 state decisions

How this case has been cited

Cited by 36 later decisions — most recently August 2016 · most notably Raney v. Barnes Lumber Corp. (1954), Seaboard Ice Co. v. Lee (1957)

3 federal appellate · 29 state decisions

8019441950196019701980199020002010decided

Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.

Relationships

Relies on Lowther Oil Co. v. Miller-Sibley Oil Co. · Dyer v. Duffy · Hurt v. Jones · Scott v. Albemarle Horse Show Ass'n · Walker v. Henderson

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 36 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. ““No principle of equity is more generally approved than that the specific performance of a contract is not a matter of absolute right but rests in a sound judicial discretion. In order for a litigant to avail himself of this extraordinary remedy, he must show that he has been able, ready, prompt, eager and willing to perform the contract on his part. He must not have remained quiet or held himself aloof so as to enforce or abandon the contract as events might prove advantageous. * *” Griscom v. Childress, 183 Va. 42, 47-8 , 31 S.E.2d 309, 312 . Reutt v. Jordan, 207 Va. 869 , 153 S.E.2d 197 ; 17 Mich. Jur., Specific Performance, § 27, p. 46. .”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.