Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 183 VA 882 - Cogito v. Dart

Cogito v. Dart’s Empirical Analysis

1945

Citation profile

13
cited by 13 later decisions
1
states following
October 2018
most recently cited

9 state decisions

How this case has been cited

Cited by 13 later decisions — most recently October 2018

9 state decisions

6019451950196019701980199020002010decided

Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.

Relationships

Relies on 105 W. Va. 395 - MacCorkle v. City of Charleston · Hodges v. S. & R. R. R. · Lemay v. Furtado · Goodloe v. Woods · Schwalm v. Beardsley

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 13 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “[T]he boundary on a way, public or private, includes the soil to the center of the way if owned by the grantor and there are no words or specific descriptions to show a contrary intention.”
    2 later decisions quote this exact passage · from the majority
  2. ““The seller of land can ordinarily have no object in retaining a narrow strip along a line of his grant, particularly a strip subject to the rights of others. The strip is of no value when separated from adjoining property. The grantor’s use of and concern for it ends with his conveyance, unless some fortuitous circumstance later makes it worth while. The retention of the strip may seriously retard the improvement and further alienation of the adjoining property, especially if this strip is on a private way. Its proximity to his purchase makes the strip of direct and substantial value to the grantee.””
    1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.