Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 183 Wash. 333 - Forman v. Shields

Forman v. Shields’s Empirical Analysis

1935

Citation profile

16
cited by 16 later decisions
2
states following
November 1973
most recently cited

14 state decisions

How this case has been cited

Cited by 16 later decisions — most recently November 1973

14 state decisions

6019351940195019601970decided

Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.

Relationships

Relies on O'Brien v. Woldson · Mitchell v. Churches · Rosenstrom v. North Bend Stage Line · Jones v. Harris · Jensen v. Chicago, Milwaukee & St. Paul Railway Co.

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 16 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. ““The relation, as a legal concept cognizable by the courts, must have its origin in contract. “There must be an agreement to enter into an undertaking in the objects or purposes of which the parties to the agreement have a community of interest and a common purpose in its performance. Necessarily, the agreement presupposes that each of the parties has an equal right to a voice in the manner of its performance, and an equal right of control over the agencies used in its performance. One or more of the parties may, of course, intrust performance to another or others, but this involves only the law of agency.””
    1 later decision quote this exact passage
  2. ““No person transported by the owner or operator of a motor vehicle as an invited guest or licensee without payment for such transportation shall have a cause of action for damages against such owner or operator for injuries, death or loss, in case of accident, unless such accident shall have been intentional on the part of said owner or operator.””
    1 later decision quote this exact passage

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.