Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 183 WIS 90 - Pitkunas v. State

Pitkunas v. State’s Empirical Analysis

1924

Citation profile

3
cited by 3 later decisions
3
states following
October 1953
most recently cited

3 state decisions

How this case has been cited

Cited by 3 later decisions — most recently October 1953

3 state decisions

101924193019401950decided

Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.

Relationships

Relies on Novotny v. State

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 3 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. ““It shall be unlawful for any person to secrete or destroy any fluids on premises being searched for the purpose of preventing the seizure of such fluids by the commissioner, or any peace officer.””
    1 later decision quote this exact passage

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.