Mayo v. Ford’s Empirical Analysis
1962
Citation profile
2 federal appellate · 9 state decisions
How this case has been cited
Cited by 11 later decisions — most recently April 2019
2 federal appellate · 9 state decisions
Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.
Relationships
Applies 28 U.S.C. § 1 (Bankruptcy Judgeship Act of 1992)
Relies on V The Board of Higher Education of the City of New York · Tatum v. Tatum · Di Giovanni v. Di Giovannantonio · Harsley v. United States · In Re Adams Estate
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 11 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“`the Fifth Amendment protection against compelled self-incrimination would be meaningless and hollow if the objective sought through the asking of the question could be achieved as well by a refusal to answer as by the answer itself.'”
1 later decision quote this exact passagee.g. Wilson v. Misko“social policy in favor of reaching a particular result in the close or doubtful cases.”
1 later decision quote this exact passage“strong, distinct, satisfactory, and conclusive evidence.”
1 later decision quote this exact passage
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.