¶1Judgment reversed and verdict reinstated, with costs, upon the ground that the note itself in evidence shows a consideration. Jenks, P. J., Thomas, Rich and Blackmar, JJ., concurred; Putnam, J., dissented on the ground that the note, given to an eight-year-old child, with the accompanying testimony, negatives any legal consideration, and the circumstances displace the ordinary presumption from the formula “ for value received.”
184 A.D. 910
Dougherty v. Salt
Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York
Decided May 15, 1918
Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · decided 1918-05-15
Decided 1918-05-15