State v. Smith’s Empirical Analysis
1996
Citation profile
8 federal appellate · 2 district · 66 state decisions
How this case has been cited
Cited by 85 later decisions (4 by the Supreme Court) — most recently August 2022 · most notably 132 S. Ct. 1309 - Martinez v. Ryan (2012), Martinez v. Ryan (2012)
8 federal appellate · 2 district · 66 state decisions
Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.
Relationships
Relies on Gideon v. Wainwright · Betts v. Brady · State v. Shattuck · State Ex Rel. Andrews v. Superior Court · State v. Ethington
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 85 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“Our constitution does not require, and the rules do not extend, the right to appointed counsel for indigent defendants in Rule 32 proceedings beyond the trial court's mandatory consideration and disposition of the PCR.”
1 later decision quote this exact passagee.g. State v. Mata“the procedural effect of that repeal [A.R.S. § 13-4035] applies retroactively to cases not yet final. Thus, Smith is not entitled to fundamental error review.”
1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the dissente.g. State v. Mann“[T]he trial court provides the pleading defendant a form of post-conviction appellate review via motion under Rule 32.”
1 later decision quote this exact passagee.g. Summers v. Schriro
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.