Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 184 Cal. 194 - McCarty v. Wilson

McCarty v. Wilson’s Empirical Analysis

1920

Citation profile

22
cited by 22 later decisions
3
states following
October 1982
most recently cited

19 state decisions

How this case has been cited

Cited by 22 later decisions — most recently October 1982

19 state decisions

601920193019401950196019701980decided

Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.

Relationships

Relies on Warner v. F. Thomas Parisian Dyeing & Cleaning Works · Hammond v. Cailleaud · Hyde v. Boyle · Ferguson v. Edgar · 14 Cal. App. 377 - Sisk v. Caswell

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 22 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. ““By virtue of the right conferred by section 1554 of the Code of Civil Procedure, the property might have been resold and the present purchaser held responsible if, on the second sale, enough was not realized to pay costs and the amount of the present bid, but that remedy is not exclusive and does not prevent a resort by the executor to a suit for specific performance.””
    1 later decision quote this exact passage

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.