Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 184 Conn. App. 576 - State v. Lugojanu

184 Conn. App. 576 - State v. Lugojanu’s Empirical Analysis

2018

Citation profile

4
cited by 4 later decisions
1
states following
January 2019
most recently cited

4 state decisions

Relationships

Relies on North Carolina v. Alford · Batson v. Kentucky · State v. Dupree · State v. Tabone · Galloway v. Roger Williams University

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 4 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “Absent a statutory prohibition, a term of imprisonment with the execution of such sentence of imprisonment suspended after a period set by the court and a period of probation is an authorized sentence. ... The plain language of the statute concerning authorized sentences ... specifies that a defendant can be sentenced to a term of imprisonment, but have that sentence suspended while he serves a period of probation. ... In the present case, the defendant's maximum exposure to imprisonment under such a sentence is twenty, not twenty-five, years. Moreover, § 53a-35a expressly states that the sentence of imprisonment shall be a definite sentence and ... the term shall be ... (1) [f]or a class B felony other than manslaughter in the first degree with a firearm ... a term not less than one year nor more than twenty years .... Furthermore, the statute concerning periods of probation, [§] 53a-29 (d), expressly states that the period of probation ... (1) [f]or a class B felony, [shall be] not more than five years. ... The defendant's sentence does not violate any of these provisions.”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority
  2. “that his sentence was illegal because it exceeded the statutory limit for a class B felony. Specifically, the defendant claim[ed] that a twenty year sentence of imprisonment followed by a five year term of probation effectively constitutes a twenty-five year sentence [and] thus exceeds”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority
  3. “Our determination of whether a motion to correct falls within the scope of Practice Book § 43-22 is a question of law and, thus, our review is plenary.”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.