In re Goodrich’s Empirical Analysis
184 F. 5 · 1910
Citation profile
5 federal appellate · 2 district ·
How this case has been cited
Cited by 7 later decisions — most recently September 1987
5 federal appellate · 2 district ·
Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.
Relationships
Relies on Samel v. Dodd · In re Stavrahn · First Nat. Bank v. Cole · First Nat. Bank of Biddeford v. Cole · In re Marks
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 7 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
““It is sufficient that we apply the principle that’ a judgment against a person in a civil case sustains none of the issues against the same person in criminal proceedings. In the present instance the order reported by the referee, and whatever occurred before him, may, under the liberal rules we have stated (In re Cole, 144 Fed. 392 [ 75 C. C. A. 330 ]; 163 Fed. 180 [ 90 C. C. A. 50 , 23 L. R. A. (N. S.) 255 ]), be referred to as having some weight pro and con; but this cannot be accepted as justifying the District Court from failing to revise, on a proceeding like this, the question involved with an open mind. That court was holden to receive all material proofs relating to what preceded the referee’s report, as to what followed it.””
1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majoritye.g. In re Elias““It must be made to appear affirmatively that when the order was made the bankrupt had power to obey it and that the failure to obey was willful.””
1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majoritye.g. In re Elias“shall thereupon, in a summary manner, hear the evidence as to the acts complained of....”
1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.