Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 184 F.2d 491 - Yuen Jung v. Barber

Yuen Jung v. Barber’s Empirical Analysis

184 F.2d 491 · 1950

Citation profile

43
cited by 43 later decisions
December 2017
most recently cited

26 federal appellate · 2 district ·

How this case has been cited

Cited by 43 later decisions — most recently December 2017 · most notably United States of America v. Viken Hovsepian (2004), United States ex rel. Marcello v. District Director of Immigration & Naturalization Service (1981)

26 federal appellate · 2 district ·

1701950196019701980199020002010decided

Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.

Relationships

Relies on Kristensen v. McGrath · Application of Murra · In re Murra · Molsen v. Young

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 43 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “during the five years immediately preceding the date of filing his application[,] ... has been and still is a person of good moral character, attached to the principles of the Constitution of the United States, and well disposed to the good order and happiness of the United States.”
    2 later decisions quote this exact passage · from the majority
  2. “[a] person ... who has served honorably at any time in the [Armed Forces] ... for a period or periods aggregating three years and who, if separated from such service, was separated under honorable conditions,”
    2 later decisions quote this exact passage · from the majority
  3. “[n]o person ... shall be naturalized unless such applicant... during all the periods referred to in this subsection has been and still is a person of good moral character,”
    2 later decisions quote this exact passage · from the majority

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.