Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist

184 F.2d 520

Docket No. 13043.

Hudson Engineering Corp. v. Commissioner

Ninth Circuit Court of Appeals

Decided Oct. 16, 1950.

Ninth Circuit Court of Appeals · decided 1950-10-16

Cited by 2 later decisions — most recently September 1963

1 federal appellate · 1 state decisions

2 counsel of record

Relies on Hudson Engineering Corp. v. Commissioner · Hudson v. Commissioner

Good law ✅— No negative treatment on recordhow we know

Opinion by (per_curiam) · Decided 1950-10-16

View the full empirical analysis of this case →

¶1Walter E. Barton, .Washington; D. C., for taxpayers.

¶2Harry Marselli, Ellis N. Slack, Hilbert P. Zarky, Special Assistants to Attorney General, Theron L. Caudle, Assistant Attorney General, 'Charles Oliphant, Chief Counsel, Bernard D. Daniels, Special Attorney, Bureau of Internal Revenue, Washington, D. C., for Commissioner.

¶3Before HUTCHESON, Chief Judge, and McCORD and RUSSELL, Circuit Judges.

¶4PER CURIAM.

¶5Pursuant to the motion and order entered on- September 19, 1949 to enter judgment in the case of Commissioner of Internal Revenue v. Maracaibo Oil Exploration Corporation, Tax Court Docket No. 17314, consonant with the judgment entered in the case of Commissioner of Internal Revenue v. Edward J. Hudson, Tax Court Docket No. 16380, and the motion for judgment ■filed by the respondent to enter judgment in the case of Commissioner of Internal Revenue v. Maracaibo Oil Exploration Corporation, Tax Court Docket No. 17314 consonant with the judgment entered by this Court in the case entitled: Commissioner of Internal Revenue, Petitioner v. Edward J. Hudson, Respondent, 5 Cir., 183 F.2d 180, it is now here ordered, adjudged and decreed by this Court that the judgment of the Tax Court of the United States in Commissioner of Internal Revenue v. Maracaibo Oil Exploration Corp., 11 T.C. 1042, be, and the same is hereby, affirmed.

/184/f2d/520 · .json · Public domain