Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 184 F.2d 526 - Butler v. Thompson

Butler v. Thompson’s Empirical Analysis

184 F.2d 526 · 1950

Citation profile

3
cited by 3 later decisions
November 1963
most recently cited

1 federal appellate · 1 district ·

Relationships

Applies 28 U.S.C. § 2281

Relies on Davis v. Schnell · Rice v. Elmore · Michael v. Cockerell

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 3 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. ““There was error in refusing to take appropriate action for convening a statutory court of three judges to hear the case, as substantial constitutional questions were unquestionably involved. We do not here attempt to pass upon these questions, as they are matters for the judgment of the three judge District Court, with review thereof, if any, by the Supreme Court of the United States. “The judgment dismissing the action will be reversed, and the case will be remanded to the District Court, with direction that a court of three judges be constituted as required by statute to pass upon the questions involved.””
    1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.