Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 184 F.2d 60 - National Labor Relations Board v. United Brotherhood of Carpenters

National Labor Relations Board v. United Brotherhood of Carpenters’s Empirical Analysis

184 F.2d 60 · 1950

Citation profile

44
cited by 44 later decisions
7
cited 7 times by the Supreme Court
3
states following
July 1980
most recently cited

26 federal appellate · 3 state decisions

How this case has been cited

Cited by 44 later decisions (7 by the Supreme Court) — most recently July 1980 · most notably National Labor Relations Board v. Denver Building & Construction Trades Council (1951), National Woodwork Manufacturers Ass'n v. National Labor Relations Board (1967)

26 federal appellate · 3 state decisions

2401950196019701980decided

Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.

Relationships

Relies on National Labor Relations Board v. Pennsylvania Greyhound Lines, Inc. · National Labor Relations Board v. Mexia Textile Mills, Inc. · National Labor Relations Board v. Crompton-Highland Mills, Inc. · National Labor Relations Board v. Jones & Laughlin Steel Corp. · International Brotherhood of Electrical Workers v. National Labor Relations Board

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 44 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “The basic purpose and objective of the section of the Act is to prohibit the involvement of employers in labor disputes of other employers with whom they are doing business.”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.