Universal Carloading & Distributing Co. v. Pedrick’s Empirical Analysis
184 F.2d 64 · 1950
Citation profile
8 federal appellate ·
How this case has been cited
Cited by 10 later decisions — most recently June 1992
8 federal appellate ·
Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.
Relationships
Relies on Railroad Retirement Board v. Duquesne Warehouse Co. · Despatch Shops, Inc. v. Railroad Retirement Board · Universal Carloading & Distributing Co. v. Railroad Retirement Board
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 10 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“operates any equipment or facility or performs any service (except ... casual service)) in connection with the transportation of ... property by railroad, or the receipt, delivery, elevation, transfer in transit, ... storage, or handling of property transported by railroad.”
1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.