Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist

184 F.2d 938

Docket No. 13256.

Acheson v. Particelli

Fifth Circuit Court of Appeals

Decided Nov. 3, 1950.

Fifth Circuit Court of Appeals · decided 1950-11-03

Cited by 1 later decisions — most recently November 1950

1 federal appellate ·

2 counsel of record

Good law ✅— No negative treatment on recordhow we know

Opinion by (per_curiam) · Decided 1950-11-03

View the full empirical analysis of this case →

¶1*939Fred Botts, Assistant U. S. Atty., Miami, Fla., Herbert S. Phillips, U. S. Atty., Tampa, Fla., Ernest L. Duhaime, Asst. U. S. Atty., Miami, Fla., for appellant.

¶2Glenn Bludworth, Miami, Fla., for appellee.

¶3Before HUTCHESON, Chief Judge, and HOLMES and BORAH, Circuit Judges.

¶4PER CURIAM.

¶5The suit was for a declaration of appellee’s United States nationality.

¶6Filed under the provisions of Sec. 903, 8 U.S.C.A., it was predicated on a denial of her rights and privileges as a national on the ground that under Sec. 804(b) of the Nationality Act of 1940,1 she had lost her nationality by residing continuously for three years in France, the territory of her birth.

¶7This appeal is from the judgment finding in favor of appellee’s claim that she had not lost her nationality, and adjudging her to be a national of the United States.

¶8An examination of the record disclosing that the only question presented for review is the sufficiency of the evidence to sustain the finding and declaration, and that the evidence amply supports them, the judgment is

¶9Affirmed.

/184/f2d/938 · .json · Public domain