Interstellar Starship Services, Ltd. v. Epix Inc.’s Empirical Analysis
184 F.3d 1107 · 1999
Citation profile
23 federal appellate · 11 district ·
How this case has been cited
Cited by 71 later decisions — most recently August 2022 · most notably Entrepreneur Media, Inc. v. Smith (2002), Surfvivor Media, Inc. v. Survivor Productions (2005)
23 federal appellate · 11 district ·
Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.
Relationships
Relies on Amf Incorporated v. Sleekcraft Boats E · Brookfield Communications, Inc. v. West Coast Entertainment Corp. · Margolis v. Ryan · Levi Strauss & Co. v. Blue Bell, Inc. · Mobil Oil Corporation v. Pegasus Petroleum Corporation
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 71 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“is groundless, unreasonable, vexatious, or pursued in bad faith.”
3 later decisions quote this exact passage · from the majority“48 As Carley correctly notes (in challenging the fee award to Rorion), the Lanham Act permits, but does not mandate, an award of attorneys' fees to a prevailing party in”
2 later decisions quote this exact passage · from the majority“[S] ummary judgment is generally disfavored in the trademark arena”
2 later decisions quote this exact passage · from the majority
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.