Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 184 F.3d 1154 - United States v. Schluneger

United States v. Schluneger’s Empirical Analysis

184 F.3d 1154 · 1999

Citation profile

13
cited by 13 later decisions
October 2005
most recently cited

8 federal appellate · 3 district ·

Relationships

Relies on United States v. Massey · United States v. Lugo · United States v. Janusz · United States v. Melton · United States v. Byrne

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 13 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “In a conspiracy case, loss is calculated on the basis of all reasonably foreseeable acts and omissions of others in furtherance of the jointly undertaken criminal activity, that occurred during the commission of the offense of conviction . . . .”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority
  2. “whether any rational trier of fact could have found the essential elements of the crime beyond a reasonable doubt.”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.