United States of America v. Wayne P. Williams’s Empirical Analysis
184 F.3d 666 · 1999
Citation profile
13 federal appellate · 5 state decisions
How this case has been cited
Cited by 39 later decisions — most recently July 2019 · most notably United States v. Bownes (2005), United States of America v. Tyrone Hare (2001)
13 federal appellate · 5 state decisions
Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.
Relationships
Applies 18 U.S.C. § 1001 (Comprehensive Thrift and Bank Fraud Prosecution and Taxpayer Recovery Act of 1990) · 18 U.S.C. § 152
Relies on Colby v. Jc Penney Company Inc · United States v. Wenger · United States v. Barnes · Brotherhood of Locomotive Engineers v. Atchison Topeka & Santa Fe Railroad · United States v. Martinez
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 39 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“I expressly waive my right to appeal my sentence on any ground, including any appeal right conferred by Title 18, United States Code, Section 3742 . I also agree not to contest my sentence or the manner in which it was determined in any post-conviction proceeding, including, but not limited to, a proceeding under Title 28, United States Code, Section 2255 .”
1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majoritye.g. United States v. Lee“the opinions of our sister circuits. See United States v. Williams, 184 F.3d 666 , 671 (7th Cir. 1999); see also Atchison, Topeka & Santa Fe Ry. Co. v. Pena, 44 F.3d 437 , 443 (7th Cir. 1994) (en banc) (”
1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority“The content and language of the plea agreement itself, as well as the colloquy where necessary, govern our determination as to the validity of the waiver.”
1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.