United States of America v. Leandro Pandiello’s Empirical Analysis
184 F.3d 682 · 1999
Citation profile
41 federal appellate ·
How this case has been cited
Cited by 61 later decisions — most recently May 2015 · most notably United States v. Paladino (2005), United States v. Padilla (2005)
41 federal appellate ·
Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.
Relationships
Applies 18 U.S.C. § 1203 · 18 U.S.C. § 1951 (Hobbs Act) · 18 U.S.C. § 924
Relies on United States v. Olano · United States v. Ahmad · United States v. Emerson · United States v. Wilson · United States v. Miller
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 61 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“seriously affect[ed] the fairness, integrity or public reputation of judicial proceedings.”
2 later decisions quote this exact passage · from the majority“`deprives the defendant of a substantial right' and constitutes `a serious structural defect' affecting the integrity of the judicial proceedings.”
1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority“implies that a defendant must have notice of the sentencing adjustments at issue and the government's basis for requesting them.”
1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.