Long v. Humphrey’s Empirical Analysis
184 F.3d 758 · 1999
Citation profile
12 federal appellate · 3 district · 5 state decisions
How this case has been cited
Cited by 54 later decisions — most recently April 2019 · most notably Tuan Van Tran v. Gary Lindsey Salinas Valley State Prisons (2000), Francis S. v. Stone (2000)
12 federal appellate · 3 district · 5 state decisions
Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.
Relationships
Applies 28 U.S.C. § 2254 (Antiterrorism and Effective Death Penalty Act of 1996)
Relies on Lindh v. Murphy · Arizona v. Washington · United States v. Josef Perez · Berkery v. Commissioner · Foss v. Foss
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 54 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“resulted in a decision that was contrary to, or involved an unreasonable application of, clearly established Federal law, as determined by the Supreme Court of the United States.”
7 later decisions quote this exact passage · from the majority“'decision, evaluated objectively and on the merits, resulted in an outcome that cannot reasonably be justified under existing Supreme Court precedent.'”
3 later decisions quote this exact passage · from the majority“mere disagreement with the [trial court's] conclusions is not enough to warrant habeas relief.”
2 later decisions quote this exact passage · from the majority
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.