Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 184 F.3d 858 - United States v. Clark

United States v. Clark’s Empirical Analysis

184 F.3d 858 · 1999

Citation profile

47
cited by 47 later decisions
5
states following
January 2025
most recently cited

25 federal appellate · 3 district · 8 state decisions

How this case has been cited

Cited by 47 later decisions — most recently January 2025 · most notably Rivas v. United States (2001), United States v. Alexander (2003)

25 federal appellate · 3 district · 8 state decisions

2601999200020102020decided

Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.

Relationships

Relies on Jackson v. Virginia · Kotteakos v. United States · Brown v. Ohio · Old Chief v. United States · Bell v. United States

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 47 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “[i]t shall be unlawful for any person who has been convicted in any court of, a crime punishable by imprisonment for a term exceeding one year; ... to ... possess in or affecting commerce, any firearm or ammunition.”
    2 later decisions quote this exact passage · from the majority
  2. “€œthe jury would have learned of [all evidence] regardless which separate charge was brought ... the only remedy that is necessary is to vacate one of the underlying convictions”
    2 later decisions quote this exact passage · from the majority
  3. “[T]he usual remedy is to hold that the convictions have merged and order that one be vacated.”
    2 later decisions quote this exact passage · from the majority

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.