Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 184 F.3d 955 - United States v. Newton

United States v. Newton’s Empirical Analysis

184 F.3d 955 · 1999

Citation profile

14
cited by 14 later decisions
May 2023
most recently cited

6 federal appellate ·

How this case has been cited

Cited by 14 later decisions — most recently May 2023

6 federal appellate ·

801999200020102020decided

Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.

Relationships

Relies on Smith v. United States · United States v. Hooten · United States v. Betz · United States v. Payne · United States v. Bost

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 14 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “For the enhancement to apply, the government is required to prove by a preponderance of the evidence that a weapon was present and that it was at least probable that the weapon had a nexus with the criminal activity.”
    2 later decisions quote this exact passage
  2. “by showing the existence of a temporal and spatial relation between the weapon, the drug trafficking activity, and the defendant.”
    2 later decisions quote this exact passage

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.