Barnes v. Domitrovich’s Empirical Analysis
2006
Citation profile
1 district ·
Relationships
Applies 28 U.S.C. § 1915 · 42 U.S.C. § 1983 (Civil Rights Act of 1871 / Section 1983 (Ku Klux Klan Act))
Relies on Exxon Mobil Corp. v. Saudi Basic Industries Corp. · Focus v. Allegheny County Court of Common Pleas · Walker v. Horn · Digiacomo v. Teamsters Pension Trust Fund of Philadelphia & Vicinity · Itt Corporation
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 2 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“above, the Third Circuit instructed that: [a] federal claim is inextricably inter-tunned with an issue adjudicated by a state court when: (1) the federal court must determine that the state court judgment was erroneously entered in order to grant the requested relief; or (2) the federal court must take an action that would negate the state court’s judgment. ... In other words, Rooker-Feld-man does not allow a plaintiff to seek relief that, if granted, would prevent a state court from enforcing its orders.”
1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority“(1) when the claim was actually litigated before the state court; or (2) when the claim is inextricably intertwined with the state adjudication.”
1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.