Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist

184 F. App'x 339

Ault v. Haines

U.S. Courts of Appeals

Decided June 8, 2006

This page is marked noindex.

U.S. Courts of Appeals · decided 2006-06-08

Applies 28 U.S.C. § 2254 (Antiterrorism and Effective Death Penalty Act of 1996)

Affirmed by unpublished PER CURIAM opinion · Decided 2006-06-08

PER CURIAM:

¶1 Stoney William Ault, a state prisoner, appeals the district court’s order adopting the recommendation of the magistrate judge and denying relief on his 28 U.S.C. § 2254 (2000) petition without prejudice. We have reviewed the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm on the reasoning of the district court. See Ault v. Haines, No. CA-04-94 (N.D.W.Va. Sept. 30, 2005). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

¶2 AFFIRMED.

/184/fappx/339 · .json · Public domain