Korman v. Nobile’s Empirical Analysis
1960
Citation profile
7 federal appellate · 7 district · 1 state decisions
How this case has been cited
Cited by 20 later decisions — most recently November 2008
7 federal appellate · 7 district · 1 state decisions
Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.
Relationships
Applies 35 U.S.C. § 24
Relies on Hickman v. Taylor · United States v. Reynolds · United States v. 5 Cases, More or Less · Martin v. Capital Transit Co. · Cleary Bros. v. Christie Scow Corp.
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 20 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“Under § 24, which I have just quoted, the applicable rules of civil procedure must be considered in determining the questions before the court relative to the attendance of witnesses and the production of documents. Rules 26, 30, 34 and 45, Fed.Rules Civ.Proc. 28 U.S.C.A. relating to the attendance of witnesses and the production of documents are applicable in the present proceeding.”
1 later decision quote this exact passagee.g. Hogan v. Zletz
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.