Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 184 F. Supp. 2d 227 - DiGrado v. Ashcroft

184 F. Supp. 2d 227 - DiGrado v. Ashcroft’s Empirical Analysis

2002

Citation profile

7
cited by 7 later decisions
November 2004
most recently cited

2 federal appellate · 1 district ·

Relationships

Applies 28 U.S.C. § 2241 (Antiterrorism and Effective Death Penalty Act of 1996) · 8 U.S.C. § 1252 (§ 242 of the Immigration and Nationality Act of 1952 (McCarran-Walter)) · 8 U.S.C. § 1326 (§ 276 of the Immigration and Nationality Act of 1952 (McCarran-Walter))

Relies on Parklane Hosiery Co. v. Shore · Immigration and Naturalization Service v. Enrico St Cyr · Harper v. Virginia Department of Taxation · Janet Reno, Attorney General v. American-Arab Anti-Discrimination Committee et al. · United States v. Mendoza-Lopez

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 7 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “In the present case, although Immigration Judge Meisner's decision ultimately proved to be an incorrect application of the revisions to the immigration laws, this fact did not render his decision void or otherwise subject to relitigation. Since the issue of his deportability has already been fully and fairly litigated [during the course of his immigration proceedings], the doctrine of res judicata precludes DiGrado from relitigating this claim in the present habeas corpus action.”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority
  2. “Absent custody by the authority against whom relief is sought, jurisdiction usually will not lie to grant the requested writ.”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority
  3. “jurisdiction is lacking pursuant to § 2241”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.