Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist

184 Ga. 411

Van Ormer v. Harris

Supreme Court of Georgia

Decided April 15, 1937

Supreme Court of Georgia · decided 1937-04-15

Relies on Bowen v. Smith-Hall Grocery Co. · Scoggins v. Knox · Gilbert v. Tippens, superintendent of banks

Good law ✅— No negative treatment on recordhow we know

Decided 1937-04-15

How this case has been cited

Cited by 5 later decisions — most recently September 1952

5 state decisions

20193719401950decided

Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.

View the full empirical analysis of this case →

Belt,, Justice.

¶1The bill of exceptions as brought by the plaintiff assigns error only upon an order overruling thé plaintiff’s demurrer to the defendants’ plea in abatement. The judgment overruling the demurrer was not a final judgment, nor would a judgment sustaining the demurrer, as sought by the plaintiff, have been a final disposition of the case. Code, § 6-701; Bozeman v. Ward-Truitt Co., 141 Ga. 45 (80 S. E. 320); Johnson v. Merchants & Farmers Bank, 141 Ga. 721 (81 S. E. 873); City of Tallapoosa v. Brock, 143 Ga. 599 (2) (85 S. E. 755); Western & Atlantic Railroad Co. v. Williams, 146 Ga. 27 (90 S. E. 478). It follows that the bill of .exceptions is premature, and must be dismissed. While no motion to dismiss has been made, it is the duty of this court to take notice of its own lack of jurisdiction; and the failure to assign error upon a final judgment is a defect relating to jurisdiction. Gilbert v. Tippens, 183 Ga. 497 (188 S. E. 699); Lynch v. Nations, 48 Ga. App. 549 (173 S. E. 203).

¶2Writ of error dismissed.

All the Justices concur.
/184/ga/411 · .json · Public domain