184 Ill. App. 3d 718 - People v. Miranda’s Empirical Analysis
1989
Citation profile
3 district · 11 state decisions
Relationships
Applies 8 U.S.C. § 1182 (§ 212 of the Immigration and Nationality Act of 1952 (McCarran-Walter)) · 8 U.S.C. § 1253 (§ 243 of the Immigration and Nationality Act of 1952 (McCarran-Walter)) · 8 U.S.C. § 1254 (§ 244 of the Immigration and Nationality Act of 1952 (McCarran-Walter))
Relies on Strickland v. Washington · Hill v. Lockhart · McMann v. Richardson · Griffith v. Kentucky · Allen v. Hardy
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 14 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“whether defendant was denied his right to the effective assistance of counsel when his attorney, knowing that he was an alien in this country illegally, did not advise defendant as to, or even research the effect of a guilty plea and conviction on his immigration status,”
1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority“ineffective assistance render[s] a guilty plea involuntary where counsel knows his client is an alien and does nothing to inform him of possible deportation consequences.”
1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority“fell below an objective standard of reasonableness,”
1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.