Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 184 IND 17 - Marchant v. Olson

Marchant v. Olson’s Empirical Analysis

1915

Citation profile

18
cited by 18 later decisions
1
states following
June 1972
most recently cited

18 state decisions

How this case has been cited

Cited by 18 later decisions — most recently June 1972

18 state decisions

1001915192019301940195019601970decided

Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.

Relationships

Relies on Boos v. State · Dinwiddie v. Shipman · Gregory v. Perdue

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 18 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. ““When a court acquires jurisdiction of the subject-matter of a cause its power continues to final disposition, to the exclusion of authority to interfere by a court of coordinate jurisdiction. Such rule avoids confusion and needless expense. Boos v. State (1911), 175 Ind. 389, 391 , 94 N. E. 410 [sic, 401]; Gregory v. Perdue (1867), 29 Ind. 66, 69 ; 7 R. C. L. [Courts] 1066 [sic, 1067], §105.” 14 Am. Jur., Courts, §243, p. 435, 21 C. J. S., Courts, §492, p. 745.”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.