Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 184 Kan. 587 - State v. Sims

State v. Sims’s Empirical Analysis

1959

Citation profile

36
cited by 36 later decisions
1
states following
October 1994
most recently cited

36 state decisions

How this case has been cited

Cited by 36 later decisions — most recently October 1994 · most notably State v. Thompson (1976), Board of Greenwood County Comm'rs v. Nadel (1980)

36 state decisions

20019591960197019801990decided

Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.

Relationships

Relies on Cochran v. Amrine · Union Pacific Railroad v. Missouri Pacific Railroad · Carr v. State · State v. King · State v. Teissedre

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 36 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. ““(a) If defendant does not seek to have execution of his sentence stayed, or release from custody on bond pending his appeal, he may appeal at any time within six months from the date of the sentence by serving notice of appeal on the county attorney of the county in which he was tried and filing the same with the clerk of the district court; and such clerk, within ten days after such notice is filed with him, shall send a certified copy of such notice with proof of service and a certified copy of the journal entry of defendant’s conviction to the cleric of the supreme court. Defendant shall then prepare and present his appeal in accordance with the statutes and rules of court applicable thereto. . . .””
    4 later decisions quote this exact passage · from the majority

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.