Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 184 Kan. 644 - Zehring v. Driskel

Zehring v. Driskel’s Empirical Analysis

1959

Citation profile

2
cited by 2 later decisions
1
states following
June 1961
most recently cited

2 state decisions

Relationships

Relies on Morris Shoe Co. v. Coleman · Vander Realty Co. Inc. v. Gabriel · Wood v. Stewart · State Ex Rel. Fatzer v. Sinclair Pipe Line Co. · Diehr v. Thompson Chemicals Corp.

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 2 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. ““. . . While a pleading is usually to be liberally construed in favor of the pleader, the whole of it must be considered together, and where one asserts a cause of action based, in part, upon exhibits the terms of which are contradictory to and at variance with allegations of the petition, the recitals to be found in the exhibits are controlling and determinative of the question whether the petition states a cause of action. . . .” (p. 504.)”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.