Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 184 Kan. 791 - Raynolds v. Row

Raynolds v. Row’s Empirical Analysis

1959

Citation profile

10
cited by 10 later decisions
1
states following
August 2006
most recently cited

10 state decisions

How this case has been cited

Cited by 10 later decisions — most recently August 2006

10 state decisions

40195919601970198019902000decided

Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.

Relationships

Relies on Martin v. Battey · Roberts v. Cooter · Suits v. Mobil Crude Purchasing Co. · Zane v. Vawter · Chicago, Rock Island & Pacific Railway Co. v. Wynkoop

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 10 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. ““. . . Where the decree sought will act upon the person of a defendant rather than upon the real property, the location of the land indirectly affected is immaterial, and the action is considered to be transitory and may be brought wherever the defendant may be served with summons. . . .” (Syl. 1.)”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.