Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 184 MASS 541 - Conness v. Commonwealth

Conness v. Commonwealth’s Empirical Analysis

1904

Citation profile

32
cited by 32 later decisions
5
states following
February 1989
most recently cited

2 federal appellate · 30 state decisions

How this case has been cited

Cited by 32 later decisions — most recently February 1989 · most notably Vallejo & Northern R.R. v. Reed Orchard Co. (1915), Newton Girl Scout Council, Inc. v. Massachusetts Turnpike Authority (1956)

2 federal appellate · 30 state decisions

100190419101920193019401950196019701980decided

Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.

Relationships

Relies on Commonwealth v. Sturtivant · Moulton v. Newburyport Water Co. · Providence & Worcester Railroad v. City of Worcester · Maynard v. City of Northampton · Cochrane v. Commonwealth

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 32 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “"The sum to be awarded for real estate taken is the fair market value of the property, having reference to all the uses to which it is adapted. Its value for any special purpose is not the test, although it may be considered, with a view of ascertaining what the property is worth in the market for any use for which it would bring the most."”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage
  2. ““Igi.ovunce of (ho market price of land in the vicinity leaves the testimony of mechanical engineers and mill managers of little worth as to market values.’’”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.