Judik v. Travers’s Empirical Analysis
1944
Citation profile
4 district · 17 state decisions
How this case has been cited
Cited by 21 later decisions — most recently January 2010
4 district · 17 state decisions
Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.
Relationships
Relies on Robinson v. Mercantile Trust Co. · Estate of Childs v. Hoagland · Buchwald v. Buchwald · Grace v. Thompson · Hooper v. Felgner
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 21 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
““Where a will is drawn by one learned in the law and skilled in the use of its terminology, the words employed will be considered as- having been deliberately chosen to express the testator’s intention and will ordinarily be given their accustomed technical meaning. Buchwald v. Buchwald, 175 Md. 103, 111 , 199 A. 795 ; Wiesenfeld v. Rosenfeld, 170 Md. 63 , 183 A. 250 .” Id. at 225.”
2 later decisions quote this exact passage · from the majoritye.g. Scott v. Shuffler · Veditz v. Athey
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.