184 Misc. 2d 105 - Firth v. State’s Empirical Analysis

Citation profile

6 federal appellate ·

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 14 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

1. “[T]he defendant's allegedly wrongful acts consisted of the issuance of the report on December 16, 1996 and its initial publication upon the Internet on the same date. Any continuing damage to the claimant arising from its availability upon the Internet would simply be a continuing effect of an earlier wrongful act.”). Of course, substantive changes or updates to previously hosted content that are not”

   2 later decisions quote this exact passage · from the majority
   e.g. Oja v. United States Army Corps of Engineers · Robert Oja v. United States Army Corps of Engineers Robert B. Flowers, Lieutenant General

2. “Concerns regarding the rapid pace of changes in the way information is disseminated, the desire to avoid multiplicity of suits and the need to give effect to relevant Statutes of Limitation which gave rise to the single publication rule ... are no less germane today than at the time of the rule’s adoption. Id.”

   1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority
   e.g. Mitan v. Davis