Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 184 MO 223 - State v. Lentz

State v. Lentz’s Empirical Analysis

1904

Citation profile

42
cited by 42 later decisions
6
states following
August 1962
most recently cited

40 state decisions

How this case has been cited

Cited by 42 later decisions — most recently August 1962 · most notably State v. Pinkston (1935), State v. Pratt (1923)

40 state decisions

1601904191019201930194019501960decided

Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.

Relationships

Relies on State v. Noland · State v. Pratt · State v. Shipley · State v. Adams · State v. . King

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 42 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. ““If any officer, agent, clerk, servant, or collector of any incorporated company, or any person employed in any such capacity, shall embezzle or convert to his own use, . . . without the assent of his master or employer, any money . . . which shall have come into his possession or under his care by virtue of such employment or office, he shall, upon conviction, be punished, etc. ’ ’”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.