Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 184 MOAPP 229 - Skinner v. Whitlow

Skinner v. Whitlow’s Empirical Analysis

1913

Citation profile

16
cited by 16 later decisions
2
states following
June 1990
most recently cited

16 state decisions

How this case has been cited

Cited by 16 later decisions — most recently June 1990

16 state decisions

40191319201930194019501960197019801990decided

Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.

Relationships

Relies on Mockowik v. Kansas City · Richardson v. Cole · Rodan v. St. Louis Transit Co. · Sowders v. St. Louis & San Francisco Railroad · Torbert v. Jeffrey

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 16 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “without prejudice to the right of respondent [the administrator] to apply to the probate court for the allowance of such attorney's fees as in the opinion of that court should be allowed for defending the final settlement against the exceptions which pertain alone to the credits taken by respondent therein”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.